Cases 21 - 30 of 129
Tharps v. USA-2255
as 8:2020cv01546
Petitioner:
Jay Maurice Tharps
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Roberts v. State's Attorney Office of Baltimore County et al
as 1:2020cv01385
Defendant:
Baltimore County Police and State's Attorney Office of Baltimore County
Plaintiff:
Tony Maurice Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dawson v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv01423
Petitioner:
Shed Maurice Dawson, Jr.
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rogers v. Baltimore City Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00705
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police Department, Evodoo Hendrix, Maurice Ward, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Tevin Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smalls v. Spellbring et al
as 1:2020cv00642
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant:
Judge William Spellbring, The Court of Special Appeals of MD., Prince George's County Circuit Court of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smalls v. Pearson et al
as 1:2020cv00097
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant:
Court Clerk Sydney J. Harrison and Judge Michael R. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smalls v. Spellbring et al
as 1:2019cv03501
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant:
Judge William Spellbring, The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, The Court of Appeals of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McKay v. USA - 2255
as 8:2019cv03012
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
Maurice McKay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smalls v. Spellbring et al
as 1:2019cv03022
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant:
Judge William Spellbring, The Court of Special Appeals of MD., The Court of Appeals of MD. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Peppers v. Moubarek et al
as 8:2019cv02346
Defendant:
John Doe and Mohammed Moubarek
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
