Cases 21 - 28 of 28
DOMES v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2008cv01402
Petitioner:
EDWARD DOMES
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, PA. ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE ALLEGHENY CO. DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARTER vs. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2008cv01284
Plaintiff:
RICO D. CARTER
Defendant:
MELVIN LOCKETT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MINDER v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2008cv00214
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
DONALD EARL MINDER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WEST v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2008cv00482
Petitioner:
GIRARD WEST
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREEN v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2008cv00155
Petitioner:
EDDIE P. GREEN
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
AARON T. JONES
Defendant:
MELVIN LOCKETT, FRANCIS ROYER, PAUL THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2007cv04677
Petitioner:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SZAREWICZ v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2007cv00160
Petitioner:
STEVEN SZAREWICZ
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
