Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Myers v. Daley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff: James Kline Myers
Defendant: Jailer James Daley, Deven Rodriquez, Deputy Karl T. Markowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nantz v. Laurel County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Plaintiff: Charles Nantz
Defendant: Laurel County, Kentucky, Jamie Mosley and Connor Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Faye et al
as 5:2022cv00005
Plaintiff: Michael Hill
Defendant: OFC. William Faye, Justin Fowler, Seth Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Faye et al
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff: Michael Hill
Defendant: OFC. William Faye, Justin Fowler, Seth Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. McCracken County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00153
Plaintiff: Cindy Mitchell
Defendant: McCracken County Jail and Mrs. Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. McCracken County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00150
Plaintiff: Cindy Mitchell
Defendant: McCracken County Jail and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooley v. Jordan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00142
Plaintiff: Corey Eugene Wooley
Defendant: Scott Jordan, Department of Corrections, Garth Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. USA
as 7:2021cv00071
Petitioner: Christina Brook Mitchell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mitchell v. Liebenrood et al
as 5:2021cv00135
Plaintiff: Cindy Mitchell
Defendant: A. Liebenrood and Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv00460
Plaintiff: Robert Dean Mitchell
Defendant: Merrick Garland, Michael Carvajal, DSCC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?