Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Young v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 5:2014cv00075
Petitioner:
Darryl Maurice Young
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. SECRETARY OF CORRECTION
as 6:2014cv00043
Petitioner:
Darryl Maurice Young
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2014cv00027
Petitioner:
Darryl Maurice Young
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. SECRETARY OF CORRECTION
as 4:2014cv00005
Petitioner:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. State of Maryland
as 13-7911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, c/o Douglas F. Gansler, Atty Gen. (individually & officially)
Defendant:
LIAM KENNEDY, Librarian (individually & officially)
Darryl Young v. Patricia Clayton
as 13-13668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CLAYTON, Senior Court Clerk of Central Intake, Lake County Courthouse
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. A. Whitacre
as 13-6838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT A. WHITACRE, M. L. STALLINGS, CO II and WARDEN BOBBY P. SHEARIN
Young v Theilen
as 5:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Young
Defendant:
Gerald O. Theilen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Clayton
as 5:2013cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Young
Defendant:
Patricia Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Dority
as 5:2012cv00634
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Young
Defendant:
Ms. Dority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
