Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Province v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00318
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Province
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00323
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Cedrick C. Thomas
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthington v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Austin Worthington
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. DeGrange et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Brad Hoenig, Dave DeGrange and others
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Rentals et al
as 4:2018cv00306
Petitioner:
Romeo Hardin
Respondent:
Kim Rentals and Patti Wachtendorf
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bragg v. Kracht et al
as 4:2018cv00264
Defendant:
John Hawk, Adam Benda, Chris Tripp and others
Plaintiff:
Darvill Jimmy Joseph Bragg
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Wachtendorf et al
as 4:2018cv00260
Defendant:
Mark McGraw, Jeremy Engeman, Lenrenzo Riles and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell McGhee
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Iowa Medical Classification Center et al
as 4:2018cv00256
Defendant:
Michelle Waddle, Greg Ort, Brandon Gilpin and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Collins
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wachtendorf
as 4:2018cv00242
Respondent:
Patti Wachtendorf
Petitioner:
Jessie James Jones, Jr.
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Wachtendorf
as 4:2018cv00234
Respondent:
Patty Wachtendorf
Petitioner:
Andrew Paul Jackson, Jr
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
