Cases 21 - 30 of 60
LANGAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv02524
Plaintiff:
DONNA LANGAN and PETER KEVIN LANGAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, ELIZABETH STAHL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01544
Defendant:
PETER MCNEILLY, JOE BIDEN, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01496
Defendant:
PETER MCNEILLY, JOE BIDEN, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AJAYI v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv01019
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MURIEL BOWSER, PETER NEWSHAM and others
Plaintiff:
OLUWASHOLA OLANIYI AJAYI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GAKUBA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03300
Plaintiff:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEHOE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02495
Respondent:
DONALD J. TRUMP and PETER STROZOK
Petitioner:
ANNE KEHOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. NEWSHAM et al
as 1:2019cv02190
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and PETER NEWSHAM
Plaintiff:
JUAN SYLVESTER BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv01636
Defendant:
STRAIGHT, SAMANTHA L. ZAREK, RONALD MCDAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
