Cases 21 - 30 of 183
MCCRAY v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2020cv09043
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
PETER MCCRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2020cv08924
Defendant:
DAVID METELOW, ASST. SUPERINTENDENT LISA SWIFT, SCO. APRIL WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2020cv00810
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, JOHN TSOUKARIS, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
Peter Lee Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDREWS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2019cv21277
Defendant:
ASST. ADMIN. AMY EMRICH, APN. INAISH JACKSON, INV. RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
AMIR ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. LEITH
as 1:2019cv13891
Petitioner:
PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
MATTHEW LEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIPIETRO v. WARDEN OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2019cv12709
Respondent:
WARDEN OF THE CAMDEN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, WARDEN OF THE SALEM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Petitioner:
PETER DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AZIZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv09325
Petitioner:
ABDUL AZIZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STEVEN JOHNSON, OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
