Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Samal v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Pradyumna Kumar Samal
Respondent:
I Jacquez, C Peters and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sierra v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2022cv01509
Petitioner:
Siegfred Sierra
Respondent:
I Jacquez, C Peters and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ashemuke v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2022cv01320
Petitioner:
Emmanual Ashemuke and Emmanuel Ashemuke
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv05361
Plaintiff:
Matthew Young
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Department of Corrections, Multnomah County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. USA
as 1:2022cv03031
Petitioner:
Santos Peter Murillo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thurura et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00037
Defendant:
Zina Blancher, State of Washington, Mark Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thurura, Dustin G Abrams, Daniel Lazcono and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00230
Petitioner:
Santos Peter Murillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dingus v. Ajax
as 4:2021cv05097
Plaintiff:
John Peter Dingus, Jr
Defendant:
Shelly Ajax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munywe v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv05431
Defendant:
Julie Dier, Scott R Peters, Malerie Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Muthee Munywe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonia et al v. Taverner et al
as 2:2020cv00369
Plaintiff:
Peter Gibbs and Brett Brooke Sonia
Defendant:
Taverner and Janet Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
