Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Duarte v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Texas, Robert Mclore, Sharon Mcarae and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Rayford et al
as 5:2022cv00279
Petitioner:
Charlie Perez
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford, Roger L. Boyd, Vernet A. Davis, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wanzer v. Rayford
as 22-50163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerry Wanzer
Defendant / Appellee:
Phonso J. Rayford, Senior Warden, John B. Connally Unit, sued in their individual and official capacity, John A. Marcum, Asst. Warden, John B. Connally Unit, sued in their individual and official capacity, Frank Stengel and others
Gibbs v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Marcello LaCraig Gibbs
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Phonso J. Rayford, John A. Marcum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Rayford
as 5:2021cv01212
Plaintiff:
Jesus R. Hawkins
Defendant:
Phonso J. Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell et al v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv01209
Petitioner:
John David Russell
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mack v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2021cv01184
Plaintiff:
Fletcher Kevin Mack
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, John Werner, C.F. Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Rayford et al
as 5:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Hylen Russell Scott
Defendant:
Phonse J. Rayford, Donnie Todd, Albert B. Peralez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Rayford et al
as 5:2021cv00727
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Quick
Defendant:
Phonso J. Rayford, Roger L. Boyd and Larissa S. Wysocki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Rayford et al
as 5:2021cv00351
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Larissa S. Wysocki, Phonso J. Rayford and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Solomon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
