Cases 21 - 30 of 188
Davis v. Pierre
as 0:2022cv62252
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Romario Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Marc v. Jung et al
as 8:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Pierre C. Marc
Defendant:
William F. Jung, Amanda Arnold Sansone and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill et al v. Ms. Valdez et al
as 8:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill, Clifford E. Gaynor, Russell E. Lee and others
Defendant:
Ms. Valdez, Warden Roger Hester, Ms. H. Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00539
Petitioner:
Darrell Pierre Hopkins
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morrow v. Grayes et al
as 3:2022cv01286
Plaintiff:
Shawn Pierre Morrow
Defendant:
Mary Grayes, Raqual L. Rhoades and David A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. Reddick et al
as 9:2022cv81463
Plaintiff:
Caisy Frank
Defendant:
Deputy Reddick and Sergeant Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Marc v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv02278
Petitioner:
Pierre C. Marc
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Marc v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv02277
Petitioner:
Pierre C. Marc
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Constant v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Brian Charles Pierre Constant, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierre v. State of Florida et al
as 5:2021cv00584
Plaintiff:
Manes Pierre
Defendant:
State of Florida, William Gladson and Daniel B. Merritt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
