Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Poole v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Volusia County)
as 6:2020cv00744
Petitioner:
Robert F. Poole
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Poole et al
as 2:2020cv14052
Defendant:
S. Poole, Centurion of Florida, L.L.C., Kibler and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. BREEDLOVE et al
as 3:2019cv04928
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
MEGAN COSBY BREEDLOVE, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF and TROY BREEDLOVE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Samson et al
as 9:2019cv80629
Defendant:
Victor M. Rosado, FNU Kirsche, FNU Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Poole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2019cv00088
Defendant:
HEATH HOLLAND, BRIAN EUSTICE, CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAKISHA LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Thomas Winhoven, K. Kabul and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lieture Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Poole et al
as 3:2018cv01379
Defendant:
Columbia Correctional Institution and Ms. Poole
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01052
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Victoria Q. Poole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poole v. United States of America
as 9:2018cv80966
Plaintiff:
Vincent Poole
Defendant:
United States of America and Miami Federal Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Poole v. Masony et al
as 2:2018cv00457
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Kimberly Roberts, Marie Nembhard and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Poole, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
