Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Dyess v. Mullins et al
as 1:2016cv00910
Plaintiff:
Sir Michael Dyess
Defendant:
Neil Mullins, C/O Gifford, R/N Joiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Headrick v. Bland
as 7:2016cv00315
Respondent:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland
Petitioner:
Jimmy L. Headrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Bland
as 7:2016cv00124
Defendant:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia vs Bland
as 7:2016cv00126
Respondent:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland
Petitioner:
Rafael Leon Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Bland, Et Al
as 7:2016cv00116
Defendant:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland, Raymond Keith Fivecoat, Alan B. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Dusty Lee Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Bland, et al
as 7:2016cv00110
Respondent:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland, Justin Low, John W. Smith and others
Petitioner:
Carroll Carpenter
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Bland et al
as 7:2016cv00090
Defendant:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland, Mark Donaldson, Adrian Olivas and others
Plaintiff:
Carroll Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villa v. Ector County Adult Probation
as 7:2016cv00019
Defendant:
Dictrict Attorney R. N. Bland, Carmen Witt - Ector County Adult Probation, Michael McLeaish and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Villa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2014cv01054
Plaintiff:
Warren Junius Massey
Defendant:
John H. Rutherford, M. S. Allen, M. I. Carney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamisi Calloway v. Rangel, et al
as 14-16294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RANGEL, Sergeant, PYLE, Correctional Officer, TOMES, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
