Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Griffith v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Austin Christian Griffith
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Huston Wells, Michael Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Rowlette et al
as 5:2016cv00124
Petitioner:
Todd Bonds
Respondent:
R.W. (Rick) Rowlette, Blackburn Correctional Complex, Ms. McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Rowlette
as 3:2016cv00115
Petitioner:
Kevin Franklin
Respondent:
Rick Rowlette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Mazzacone et al
as 3:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Moore
Defendant:
Mazzacone, Abrams, Franklin County Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Miles
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, LaDonna Thompson, Don Bottom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders et al v. Bottom et al
as 5:2014cv00417
Plaintiff:
B.R.S. , H.M.J.S. and Rebecca Marie Lindsey
Defendant:
Don Bottom , Rick Rowlette , Correctcare - Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Herrington et al
as 4:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Adam Reynolds
Defendant:
Ron Herrington, Rick Hendricks and Unknown McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Clemons et al
as 4:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Marchmond Cottrell
Defendant:
Rick Clemons and Terry Blanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Taylor County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Combs
Defendant:
Taylor County Detention Center, John Shipp and Rick Bennifield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardison v. Denison et al
as 3:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
James Hardison
Defendant:
Timothy Denison, Dennis C. Burke and Rick Hessig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
