Cases 21 - 30 of 308
(PC) Haywood v. Reed
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lee Haywood
Defendant:
Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Cates
as 3:2022cv07282
Petitioner:
Mychal A. Reed
Respondent:
Warden Bob Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oden v. Reed et al
as 5:2022cv06980
Plaintiff:
Terrell Oden
Defendant:
J. Reed and J. Peffley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Adventist Health Bakersfield, et al.
as 1:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
Floyd Scott
Defendant:
Adventist Health Bakersfield, Kathleen L Thomas, David Reed Condie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC)Suarez v. Beard et al
as 2:2018cv00340
Defendant:
Lee, Davis, Moua and others
Plaintiff:
Maher Conrad Suarez
Respondent:
Tucker, Partida and Garcia
Not Classified By Court:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arzuray D. Reed v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv03693
Petitioner:
Arzuray D. Reed
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mazen Alawi v. Unkown et al
as 5:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Mazen Alawi
Defendant:
Unkown, County of Riverside Sheriff, Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Reed v. Six Unknown Agents
as 2:2022cv03973
Plaintiff:
Vincent Reed
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents, Louis Milusnic, Liza Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
