Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Kindred v. LaClair et al
as 9:2013cv01229
Plaintiff:
Tarand Kindred
Defendant:
Darwin LaClair, Jim Doe and J. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06742
Plaintiff:
Ruben Rivers
Defendant:
City of New York, Stephen Wettenstein and Murdoch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Smith
as 1:2013cv04786
Petitioner:
Sherman Rivers
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. United States of America Government et al
as 1:2013cv01680
Respondent:
Every Other Legislature States/Countries, The House of Congress, The Legislaturees of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Petitioner:
Enzo Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivers v. Smith
as 1:2013cv00549
Petitioner:
Sherman Rivers
Respondent:
Superintendent Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. Page et al
as 6:2012cv06593
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Rivers
Defendant:
R. Page and J. Mahunik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. River View Correction et al
as 9:2012cv00878
Plaintiff:
Santos Vasquez
Defendant:
River View Correction, Officer Hooper, Gouverneur Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. River View Correction et al
as 6:2012cv06247
Plaintiff:
Santos Vasquez
Defendant:
River View Correction, Officer Hooper, Gouverneur Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flake v. Washington County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 9:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
Justin Flake
Defendant:
Washington County Sheriff's Dept., Howard Peck, Neil Hafner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv05917
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
