Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Roman v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv05995
Plaintiff:
Salvador Roman
Defendant:
Lee, Foo, John Doe Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitroser v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv04142
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Roman Kitroser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reaves v. Supreme Court State of New York, Second Judicial District et al
as 1:2017cv01693
Defendant:
Sheila Abdus-Salam, Rachel Amy Adams, Sylvia G. Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roman v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv04829
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Joshua Roman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Oscar Morales-Roman v. USA
as 5:2016cv00710
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Oscar Morales-Roman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCoy et al v. Mingo et al
as 1:2016cv03606
Plaintiff:
Thomas McCoy and Roman Rivera
Defendant:
Max'Solaine Mingo, Department of Corrections and Correction Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keaton et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv03063
Plaintiff:
Eric Keaton, Joseph Ward, Anthony Nelson and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Joseph Ponte, Monica Windley, Deputy Warden Security Caputo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02882
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Abraham Thomas, Jose Pizarro and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C.D.O.C. Dept. Transportation Comm. John/Jane Doe and Bus Drivers John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02884
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Peter Bohning, Abraham Thomas and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ochoa v. Bratton et al
as 1:2016cv02852
Defendant:
Bratton, William Bratton, Bronx Drug Task Force and others
Plaintiff:
Ochoa and Roman Ochoa
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel NYC Law Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
