Cases 21 - 30 of 130
Charles Reed v. G. Hammond, et al
as 22-35355
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES V. REED
Defendant / Appellant:
G. STEVEN HAMMOND, LARA STRICK and SARA KARIKO, FKA Sara Smith
Defendant:
ROB WEBER, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD L. MORGAN and others
Fowler v. Haynes
as 3:2022cv05270
Petitioner:
Vincent Fowler
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fowler v. Haynes
as 3:2022cv05235
Petitioner:
Vincent Fowler
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beasley v. Haynes
as 2:2022cv00258
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Stuart Beasley
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Basra v. Haynes
as 2:2022cv00217
Petitioner:
Paramjit Singh Basra
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cortney Stahl v. Ron Haynes
as 22-35148
Petitioner / Appellant:
CORTNEY JAMES STAHL
Respondent / Appellee:
RON HAYNES
Sather et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tobin Sather and Kenneth Lawrence
Defendant:
State of Washington, Jay Inslee, Stephen Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrel Harris v. Ron Haynes
as 22-35049
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARREL LORNE HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
RON HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Patrick Belser v. Ron Haynes
as 22-35013
Petitioner / Appellant:
PATRICK MICHAEL BELSER
Respondent / Appellee:
RON HAYNES, Stafford Creek Superintendent
Trujeque-Magana v. Van Ogle et al
as 3:2021cv05755
Petitioner:
Miguel Trujeque-Magana, Miguel A Trujeque-Magana and Jorge Ricardo Gongora-Chi
Respondent:
CPM Dan Van Ogle, Dan Van Ogle, Ron Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
