Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Donelson v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv01117
Plaintiff:
Charles Donelson
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Donald Gish, Angelica Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navejar v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv01532
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Navejar
Defendant:
Guy D Pierce, Michael P Melvin, S Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv01519
Plaintiff:
Ira Edwards
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, S Simpson, Michael P Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. JONES
as 3:2017cv00791
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A JACKSON
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, JIMMY COKER, CENTURION MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv01430
Plaintiff:
Yarii A Massey, Jr
Defendant:
Chad M Brown, Tina M Farr, Michael P Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffee v. Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01297
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Coffee
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, Terry Kennedy, Emily Ruskin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KeOndra Chestang v. Missally Simpson, et al
as 17-1844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KeOndra M. Chestang
Defendant - Appellee:
Missally S. Simpson, Correctional Officer, Varner SuperMax, originally named as Simpson, then Christy Simpson, Aleeshia Quinones, Nurse, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Aleshia Quinones), Teri Kennedy, Director of Nursing, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Kennedy) and others
Rodriguez v. Punke et al
as 1:2017cv01161
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Scott A Punke, Buchenau, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisle v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01158
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Melvin Hinton, Roberta Fews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kings v. McCormick et al
as 1:2017cv01128
Plaintiff:
Ralph Kings
Defendant:
McCormick, M. Hinton, Morano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.