Cases 21 - 30 of 2,477
(HC) Taylor v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
Robert Taylor and Robert L. Taylor
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Howard v. Rios et al
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
J. Rios, Steve Smith, City of Coalinga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Humboldt County Sheriff's Office Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Ryan Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Humboldt County Sheriff's Office Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr. v. Amy Boncher et al
as 2:2024cv02459
Petitioner:
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Boncher and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Paschall v. Johal, et al.
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lamar Paschall
Defendant:
Amandeep Johal, Smith, Dr. Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Deshone Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Uzma et al
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Donald Joshua Smith
Defendant:
Chaudhry Uzma, Gena Jones, Gill Amandeep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iseli v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
State of California, County of San Joaquin, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
