Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Montalto v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Montalto
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Marshall Fisher, Glen McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Bayliss Morris Jenkins
Defendant:
Tim Davis, Robert Verzal, Mitchie McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Starks et al
as 4:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Stephen Booth
Defendant:
Starks, Eric Bridgett and Trvius Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrothers v. Perkins et al
as 5:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrothers
Defendant:
Erikize Perkins, Mary Groom, Victoria Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2013cv00086
Petitioner:
Stephen Dunlap
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephens v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv00912
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Stephens
Defendant:
James R. Moore, Sr. and Johnny Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Moore et al
as 4:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Stephens
Defendant:
James R. Moore, Sr. and Johnny Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., B. Grimes, J. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gross v. Shaw et al
as 4:2012cv00194
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gross
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Frederick Young, Unknown Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baudoin v. Loper et al
as 2:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
Stephen Anthony Baudoin
Defendant:
Shane Loper, Joy Ross, Johnnie Denmark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
