Cases 21 - 30 of 288
Thomas v. USA
as 4:2022cv00301
Petitioner:
Aleta Necole Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chester v. Altus City of et al
as 5:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Allie Thomas Chester
Defendant:
Altus City of, Trea Fulton and Jason Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
Thomas Raymond Phillips, III
Respondent:
United States of America and Scott D. Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. The Geo Group Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Miguel Adrian Adams
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc, Mark Bowen, FNU Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdulhaseeb v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board
as 5:2022cv00252
Petitioner:
Madyun Abdulhaseeb, Jerry Lewis Thomas, Jerry Louis Roland and others
Respondent:
Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Cavazos v. USA
as 5:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Thomas Cavazos
Respondent:
USA and FNU Machalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grayson v. Buchanon et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert W Grayson, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin Buchanon, Will Drake, Linda Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. USA
as 6:2022cv00011
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Cain
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
