Cases 21 - 30 of 390
Brown v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Antonio Deunta Brown
Defendant:
Shawn Emmons, Hays State Prison Medical Staff Associations, Ronald Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 23-10146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
MARTIN et al v. HOLT et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Judge BEVERLY B MARTIN, Khalid Mouton and BEVERLY B MARTIN
Defendant:
PO AHMED HOLT, ROBERT TOOLE, STAN SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weems v. Smokes et al
as 5:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Cetery Lamar Weems
Defendant:
C.O.1 Smokes, CO Odom, TOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. IVEY et al
as 5:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, SERGEANT EDWARD FLOYD, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-14263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Robert Toole, Cedric Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weems v. Smokes et al
as 1:2022cv04650
Plaintiff:
Cetery Lamar Weems
Defendant:
Warden Smokes, Warden Odom, Tool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-13438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, ROBERT TOOLE, DELOACH, FNU and others
Heath et al v. Adams et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
Warden Brian Adams, Joseph Barnes, Quan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
