Cases 21 - 28 of 28
CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS") et al
as 5:2016cv00118
Petitioner:
FANY YAKELIN CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA and L.Y.T.C.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS"), U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION ("CBP"), U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
DIAZ-DIAZ et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 5:2015cv06552
Petitioner:
MARIA AMELIA DIAZ-DIAZ and J.G.H.D.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION , U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Kabenga v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv09084
Petitioner:
Musafiri G. Kabenga
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , U.S. Department Of Justice , R. Gil Kerlikowske and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252
RENDON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2013cv01636
Plaintiff:
RICARDO RENDON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patel v. U.S Customs and Border Protection
as 2:2011cv01091
Plaintiff:
Arvidkumar Manilal Patel
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-56370
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perez v. Adler, et al
as 1:2008cv00023
Petitioner:
Carlos Perez
Respondent:
Neil Adler, Neil Adler, Neil Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MENDOZA v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 2:2007cv01191
Petitioner:
HECTOR D. MENDOZA
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
