Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Agbonifo v. Joe Corley Detention Facility et al
as 4:2018cv02132
Plaintiff:
Michael Agbonifo
Defendant:
Joe Corley Detention Facility, John Doe and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. HPD et al
as 4:2018cv01825
Plaintiff:
John Palmer
Defendant:
HPD, City of Houston, Harris County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palacio v. Neal et al
as 6:2018cv00111
Defendant:
Jim Neal, Unknown Female Deputy Sheriff, Unknown Male Deputy Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Mauro C. Palacio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Mullers et al
as 4:2018cv01127
Plaintiff:
Gator James Mitchell
Defendant:
Robert Mullers and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mustafa v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sael Mustafa
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Jefferson B Sessions, III, Fernando J Gaitan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 6:2017cv00036
Petitioner:
Theron Pearson
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service and Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aguero v. Transportation Officers et al
as 4:2017cv01612
Plaintiff:
Anthony Aguero
Defendant:
Transportation Officers and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faseler v. Coastal Bend Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael Faseler
Defendant:
Coastal Bend Detention Center, Correct Care Solutions and U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt v. Chief U.S. Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv00862
Plaintiff:
Tariq Belt
Defendant:
Chief U.S. Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovell v. Rio Grande Detention Center et al
as 5:2016cv00030
Petitioner:
George T Lovell, Jr
Defendant:
Rio Grande Detention Center and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
