Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Mikeal Glenn Stine v. L. Milusnic et al
as 2:2017cv01970
Defendant:
Mr L. Milusnic, U.S. Marshal Los Angeles and Unknown Defendants
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Howard Bloomgarden v. United States Marshal David M. Singer et al
as 2:2016cv06492
Plaintiff:
Howard Bloomgarden
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim McDonnell, Regional Director Mary M Mitchell and U.S. Marshal David M Singer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. Garcia et al
as 1:2015cv01585
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Respondent:
Ryan Garcia, Delaney, Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehmood v. Nevada Southern Detention Center, et al.
as 2:2015cv01728
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Respondent:
Nevada Southern Detention Center, Corrections Corporation of America, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehmood v. Chavez et al
as 2:2015cv01695
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Michael Chavez, United States of America, Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minchaca v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2015cv00570
Plaintiff:
Jaime J. Minchaca
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and Director of Federal Revocation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Kern County Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv00318
Petitioner:
Charles E. Dunn
Respondent:
Kern County Sheriff, Donny Youngblood, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service, et al
as 2:2015cv00019
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 2:2014cv02075
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service, Sacramento County Main Jail Superintendent, Terry Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
