Cases 21 - 30 of 2,930
United States of America v. Smith
as 1:2023cv16522
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jarien Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Dennis
as 1:2023cv17108
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larry Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Modugumudi
as 1:2023cv15722
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chandra Modugumudi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Protho
as 1:2023cv16280
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bryan Protho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Martin v. Winnebago County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv50403
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Martin
Defendant:
Winnebago County Jail, Gary L. Caruana, Robert Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Longstreet
as 1:2023cv14768
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ray Longstreet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Aquino-Pacheco v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50341
Petitioner:
Tomas Aquino-Pacheco
Respondent:
United States of America and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Quintero v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2023cv50354
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Quintero
Respondent:
United States Of America and Warden/Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Redman v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04529
Petitioner:
Scott C Redman
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Lamm v. Ho et al
as 1:2023cv01367
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Lamm
Defendant:
Jeffrey Lee Ho, S Kindred and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
