Cases 21 - 30 of 709
Snead v. The United States of America et al
as 7:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
The United States of America, Commonwealth V.A, Catawba VA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beamon v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Shan Lavar Beamon
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Snead v. United States of America Armed Forces et al
as 7:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
United States of America Armed Forces, Commander & Cheif and Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snead v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
United States of America, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00219
Petitioner:
Cheron Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
