Cases 21 - 30 of 1,151
Graham v. United States et al
as 4:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
United States, Leitchfield, KY, Jason Woosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Norles v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv03233
Plaintiff:
Neal A. Norles
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Prentess Johnson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Roberts v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00914
Petitioner:
Timothy Munro Roberts
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kennemore v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant:
State of Missouri, United States Federal Government, Andrew Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meador v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
Michael D. Meador
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lowe v. James et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie James Lowe, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick James, Korey Refohert, Lynn Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keys v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moorehead v. United States
as 1:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Charles James Moorehead
Defendant:
United States and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00597
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
