Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Agnew v. United States Marshall Service et al
as 4:2019cv00055
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
United States Marshall Service et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beverly v. Joe Corley Processing Center et al
as 4:2019cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eric Beverly
Defendant:
Joe Corley Processing Center and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. United States Marshal
as 4:2018cv04134
Petitioner:
Tamara Turner
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phillips v. Tate et al
as 4:2018cv04009
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Joe Corley Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Bennie Charles Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2018cv03553
Defendant:
United States Marshal, Ed Gonzales, Marc Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Harris County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2018cv03530
Defendant:
Judge Marc Carter Harris County 228th District Court, Ed Gonzales Harris County Sheriff's Office, 5 Unknown Officers United States Marshals Service and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. Ulmen, et al
as 3:2017cv00914
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Defendant:
Jose Santana , Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teer v. United States Marshal Service
as 7:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Curtis Teer
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perales v. United States et al
as 3:2016cv02733
Plaintiff:
Michael Perales
Defendant:
United States, United States Marshals, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARZA v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2015cv00128
Respondent:
BEMENT, Officer Martinez and United States Marshal Service
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Garza, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
