Cases 21 - 29 of 29
ARSAD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2009cv03516
Plaintiff:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION, JOHN KONCHAK and DENNIS KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren Arsad, Jr. v. John J. Poserina, et al
as 09-3197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. POSERINA, PHILADELPHIA JUDGE, RICHARD SCHOLERS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ADA STENO, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
ARSAD v. THE PHILADELPHIA PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 2:2009cv03477
Plaintiff:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PROBATION OFFICE, JOSEPH MCKILLIP and LOUIS MCFEELEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARSAD v. THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv03426
Plaintiff:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant:
THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD OF PENNSYLVANIA and JOSPEH A. MASSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren F Arsad, Jr. v. Rayford Means, et al
as 09-3152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYFORD ALLEN MEANS, PHILADELPHIA COURT COMMON PLEAS, ADA CAROL SWEENEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, JOHN W. GOLDSBOROUGH and others
ARSAD v. RUDENSTEIN
as 2:2009cv03362
Plaintiff:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID RUDENSTEIN, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARSAD v. VINCI
as 2:2009cv03361
Plaintiff:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant:
JANINE VINCI, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARSAD v. MEANS et al
as 2:2009cv02980
Plaintiff:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant:
RAYFORD MEANS, CAROL SWEENEY, ESQ., JOHN GOLDSBOROUGH, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren Arsad v. Leon King, et al
as 08-4867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON KING, PRISON COMMISSIONER, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.