Cases 21 - 30 of 868
Schneider v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, J. Phillip Morgan, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgley et al v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
John Ridgley and Brandon Sweetman
Defendant:
Warden and William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00888
Petitioner:
Kareem Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gopshes v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Petitioner:
Cokie Joe Gopshes, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Judge William V. Tucker and Clerk of Court Wayne Robery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DePaola v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Eric DePaola
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, Annie D. Harvey, F. Todd Taylor, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sorrick
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodd v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
William J. Dodd
Defendant:
Warden and Chief of Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Howe v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Howe
Defendant:
Carolyn Scruggs, Annie D. Harvey, J. Philip Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Golden v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
Randy D. Golden
Respondent:
William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
