Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Rogers v. Vereen
as 3:2020cv00544
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Walter Vereen
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Sanders et al
as 5:2020cv00165
Defendant:
Travis Patten, Lillie Blackmon Sanders, Walter Armstrong and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Wingate et al
as 5:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
Louis Guirola, Jr., David Bramlette, Michael T. Parker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carruthers v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Walter Tremaine Carruthers
Defendant:
Joe McDonald, Mark Cossit, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McKiver v. Vereen
as 3:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Latimer McKiver
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Walter Vereen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duffy v. Vereen
as 3:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Charles Duffy
Defendant:
Warden Walter Vereen
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jefferson v. Vereen
as 3:2019cv00754
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Edward Jefferson
Defendant:
Walter Vereen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dearing v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Monroe Co. Cir. Court, Monroe County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcoon v. Tucker et al
as 3:2017cv00940
Plaintiff:
Walter Don Marcoon
Defendant:
Randy Tucker, Brian Watson, Madison County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County Metro Narcotics et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County Metro Narcotics, Adams County Sheriff Dept. and Walter James Mackel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
