Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Johnson Sr. v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Deputy Warden James Craig, Anita Edmonstone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ahreshien v. Watson
as 3:2022cv01303
Petitioner:
Hussam A. Ahreshien
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
as 2:2022cv02890
Petitioner:
Marvin Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson and Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Watson
as 3:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Marvin Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mejia v. Watson
as 3:2022cv01241
Petitioner:
Sidney Mejia
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. USA
as 1:2022cv00998
Petitioner:
Rashawn D. Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Yowpp v. Watson
as 3:2022cv00904
Petitioner:
Kron Yowpp
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boaston v. Watson
as 3:2022cv00854
Petitioner:
Ronald Boaston
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leach v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. Leach
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Marion Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Watson
as 3:2022cv00503
Petitioner:
Stephen Dennis Long
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
