Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Banks v. Roe et al
as 6:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Landis et al
as 4:2017cv00640
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lewis
Defendant:
Charles Landis, Kevin B. Smith and Carlisietta R. Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatlin v. Werner et al
as 6:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
David Glen Gatlin
Defendant:
Law Library Sup. Sibrena Lockhart, Assistant Warden Rene Maldonado, Law Library Sup. Timothy McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00912
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Heidi Lynn Werner Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alexander v. Birnel et al
as 6:2016cv00333
Plaintiff:
William P. Alexander
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Lisa M. Birnel, Gilbert Campuzano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Carr v. Werner
as 6:2016cv00294
Petitioner:
Thomas Raymond Carr
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Warden John Werner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Werner v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2016cv00426
Petitioner:
Michael Tyne Werner
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruffin v. Stephens et al
as 6:2016cv00162
Defendant:
FNU Adams, Bruce Armstrong, B. Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colone v. Woods et al
as 1:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Colone
Defendant:
Mitch Woods, Darren Cassidy, Cathy Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hill et al
as 6:2016cv00070
Defendant:
Robert M. Cotten, Jr., Capt. Richard W. Harvey, Roger C. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Rhondy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
