Cases 21 - 30 of 10,872
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burdex v. Turnkey Medical et al
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Elgret Lorenzo Burdex
Defendant:
Turnkey Medical, Oklahoma County Commissioners and Vicki Zemp Behenna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, D. C. Cole, Christine Topping and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee McCullough
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Amanda Honeycutt, Molly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cozart v. Tulsa County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Delmond Cornell Cozart
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff Office, Vic Regalado, Detention Officer Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethel v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Terrico Bethel
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Marthel Jermaine Ward
Defendant:
Brian Lovell and Ron Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. Oklahoma County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Demetric Hooper
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sechrist v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00503
Petitioner:
Tye A Sechrist
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Darrin Lynn Pickens
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
