Cases 21 - 30 of 1,387
Murphy v. Owens
as 1:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Andrew Thurston Murphy
Respondent:
Craig D. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Perry, D W Harmon, Tina Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Derrico D. Holland
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SMITH v. WITHERS
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SMITH, III
Respondent:
WARDEN SHANNON D WITHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nash v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Victor D. Nash
Defendant:
Warden Jacob Beasley, Willesha Warren, Michael Snowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMERSON v. HALL et al
as 5:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AMERSON
Defendant:
CORNELIA D HALL, CHRISTOPHER CARR, SHERRY BOSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JACKSON v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS D JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN BOBBITT, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES, OFFICER MARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Labat et al
as 1:2023cv05396
Plaintiff:
Alvin D. Hill
Defendant:
Patrick Labat and Fulton County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brentrez McPherson and Royal High Chief Priest BaBA
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Tyrone Oliver, Jacob Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
