Cases 21 - 30 of 5,669
Williams v. Fritel
as 0:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Roberto A. Williams
Defendant:
Mark Fritel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debenedetto v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv01563
Petitioner:
Bryant Duane Griffin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner:
Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
as 0:2024cv01535
Petitioner:
David James Cook, SR
Respondent:
Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Debenedetto v. Ford et al
as 0:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Mr Ford, RN. Officer Davidson, Associate Warden Mells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry and Cedric Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00949
Petitioner:
Phillip Harold Horswell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mangum v. Beltz et al
as 0:2024cv01505
Petitioner:
Leonard Mangum
Respondent:
Tracy Beltz and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berumen v. Segal et al
as 0:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Irene Berumen
Defendant:
Michael Segal, L. Linder, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
