Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Texas
Cases 21 - 30 of 102,692
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner: Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Petitioner: Leonardo Gutierrez
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. Laurie Sue Baldwin et al DO NOT DOCKET. Inter District Transfer to the Corpus Christi Division.
as 4:2024cv01904
Plaintiff: Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant: Laurie Sue Baldwin, Marlon Thomas, Nueces Country Jail Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00093
Petitioner: Hendrick Darnell Jones
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: Derrick D. Fields
Defendant: Jeff Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Richard Williamson
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Broadnax v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff: Marcus Derick Broadnax
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ortiz v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner: Ricardo Ismael Ortiz
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garrison v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff: William Scott Garrison
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00451
Petitioner: Edward Eugene Robinson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?