Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Saracina v. New York State et al
as 9:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Saracina
Defendant:
New York State, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Dale G. Dubrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Annucci et al
as 1:2017cv04698
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci , Jason Effman, Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komons v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Eric Komons
Defendant:
City Of New York , Smith, John Doe #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Paul Mathis
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Mark Cranston, Evelyn Mirabal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Garcia et al
as 1:2016cv07005
Defendant:
Captain Bauda, Captain M. Garcia and John Doe 1-5
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Nebo et al
as 1:2016cv04961
Plaintiff:
James Hampton
Defendant:
Tiffany Nebo, Woodhull Hospital Police, McFadden or McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percinthe v. Driver et al
as 1:2015cv03365
Defendant:
Supervisor Curtain Archer, J. Addison Driver, PA Darris Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Smith Percinthe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ulmer v. Allen et al
as 9:2015cv00497
Plaintiff:
Akeem Ulmer
Defendant:
Sergeant Allen, Correctional Officer Dibble, D. LaClair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Quarantillo et al
as 1:2015cv00936
Plaintiff:
O'Neil Wallace
Defendant:
Andrea Quarantillo, Roger Sagerman, Laura A. Michalec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv08927
Plaintiff:
Vernon Jones
Defendant:
The City Of New York, John Smith, II, Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
