Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Torres-Ibarra v. USA
as 2:2016cv00062
Petitioner:
Jorge Torres-Ibarra
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harper v. State Bar Of Texas et al
as 6:2015cv00897
Plaintiff:
Darrell J Harper
Defendant:
State Bar Of Texas and Debra Ibarra Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiroga v. Donaldson
as 7:2015cv00166
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ramon Ibarra Quiroga
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres-Ibarra v. USA
as 2:2015cv00089
Petitioner:
Jorge Torres-Ibarra
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Puckett v. Walmart Store #5823 et al
as 3:2015cv02029
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Puckett
Defendant:
Walmart Store #5823, Larry Moody, City of Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ibarra v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv00782
Petitioner:
Jose Francisco Ibarra
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibarra v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv00083
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Jose Francisco Ibarra
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibarra-Alcarez v. United States Of America
as 3:2014cv00400
Petitioner:
Adeodato Ibarra-Alcarez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carranza v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00822
Petitioner:
Javier Ibarra Carranza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jimenez v. Contrerez et al
as 5:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
Frank Joe Jimenez, III
Defendant:
NFN Contrerez, NFN Cisnaros, NFN Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
