Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Green v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00057
Petitioner:
Hugh Roger Dale Green
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hugh Knight
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curtis v. Lauderdale County Detention Center et al
as 3:2013cv00974
Plaintiff:
Gary Hugh Curtis
Defendant:
Sheila Hanlin , Southern Health Partners and Lauderdale County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Lauderdale County Detention Center et al
as 4:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Gary Hugh Curtis
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Detention Center, Lauderdale County Detention Center-Medical Staff, Sheila Hanlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walls v. Hinds County Raymond Detention Center
as 3:2012cv00084
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Walls
Defendant:
Hinds County, Unknown Ingram, Unknown McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. USA
as 4:2011cv00204
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Earl Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Green v. Dees et al
as 3:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Hugh Roger Green
Defendant:
James E. Dees and Andrew K. Howorth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Reagan et al
as 4:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
Shae Hughes
Defendant:
Kenneth Reagan, Brett Mizes, Kino Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Carroll-Montgomery Regional Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Hubbard
Defendant:
Carroll-Montgomery Regional Correctional Facility, A. L. Smith, O. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. King et al
as 2:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Cory Andrew Hughes
Defendant:
Ronald King and Joy Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
