Cases 31 - 40 of 702
VanPelt v. Warden
as 7:2023cv01550
Petitioner:
Hunter VanPelt
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tzoy v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01549
Petitioner:
Eluvina Car Tzoy
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McLeod v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv01554
Plaintiff:
Michael D McLeod
Defendant:
Michael Jones, Shannon Caldwell, Asst Warden Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Eric Keeton
Respondent:
Warden Chadwick Crabtree and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collingwood v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01489
Petitioner:
Shellee L Collingwood
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
v. Mays et al
as 4:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Michael J Mays
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Herman Harris, Kenneth Parham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Shannon Miller
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vallejo-Hernandez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01431
Petitioner:
Marilda G Vallejo-Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Britford v. McClain et al
as 7:2023cv01356
Petitioner:
Randy Earl Britford
Respondent:
Warden III Antonio McClain, Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Kimberly
as 1:2023cv01355
Petitioner:
Isaac Green, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
