Cases 31 - 40 of 4,592
Larr v. Mackey
as 2:2024cv01730
Petitioner:
Michael L. Larr
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Kiaran Young
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larr v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
Michael L. Larr
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belton v. Shoop
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Anthony Belton
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
James C Miller
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes, III v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
EnRico T Rhodes, III
Defendant:
Wellpath, Commissioner D. Ditzler, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodkinson v. Mackey
as 5:2024cv00614
Petitioner:
Michael A. Hodkinson
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01564
Petitioner:
Edward L Young
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Bryan S. Allen
Defendant:
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
