Cases 31 - 40 of 745
Austin v. Mullens et al
as 7:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sage M. Austin
Defendant:
B. Mullens, Dotson and Warden of Wallen's Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Christopher Joseph Atkins
Respondent:
Warden J. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilkins et al v. Rasnake et al
as 7:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Andre Curtis Wilkins
Defendant:
Investigator K. Rasnake, Unit Manager C. Dye, Warden Isreal D. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 7:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hudson v. Back
as 7:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Gary Matthew Hudson
Respondent:
Warden Back
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Mullens et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Sage M. Austin
Defendant:
B. Mullens, Dotson and Warden of Wallen's Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. The Estate of Sgt. Davis et al
as 7:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Powell
Defendant:
Sgt. Davis, Officer Loggin, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Edmound et al
as 7:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dan Oliver
Defendant:
Warden Edmound, Unit Manager Mr. Wooden, Lt. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez-Perez v. USP Lee, FBOP
as 7:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Cesar Francis Melendez-Perez
Respondent:
Warden USP Lee, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ra'Quan Robinson
Defendant:
Warden David Anderson, A.W. Bateman, C.O. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
