Cases 31 - 40 of 1,870
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
(PC) Younger v. Officer Alvarez et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Brandi Adrienne Younger
Defendant:
Alvarez, Gonzales, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larkin v. Cabraser et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Billy F. Larkin
Defendant:
Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Krsitopher S. Ritter, Stephen J. Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Motley v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Edward Motley
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Correctional Supervising Cook, Correctional Food Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Coley v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Andrew Calvin Coley
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva and H. Mosely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dejuan McNortan v. Moran et al
as 2:2023cv10339
Plaintiff:
Dejuan McNortan
Defendant:
Moran, Ortega, H. Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Thomas v. Warden of Folsom State Prison
as 2:2023cv02741
Petitioner:
William H. Thomas and William Henry Thomas
Respondent:
Warden of Folsom State Prison and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meraz-Espinoza v. Santoyo et al
as 3:2023cv05947
Plaintiff:
Moises Meraz-Espinoza
Defendant:
H. Santoyo, L. Marquez, C. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Lopez v. Smith
as 1:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lynn Lopez
Defendant:
H. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
