Cases 31 - 40 of 166
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Caddo Parish
as 5:2018cv01260
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Conner
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Deputy Mckeevion Clark and Sgt Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naquin v. Raymond Laborde Correctional Center et al
as 1:2018cv01170
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, James Longino, Troy Poret and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy R Naquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Pecan Haven Addiction Recovery Center et al
as 3:2018cv00930
Defendant:
Amy Gilliand, Pecan Haven Addiction Recovery Center, Stanley Neatherly and others
Plaintiff:
Rusty Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Clark
Defendant:
Unknown Coodie, Jane Doe, John Doe # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Ash et al
as 2:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jaime Hernandez
Defendant:
Jason Ash, Clark, Keith Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaspard v. Robert et al
as 3:2016cv00788
Defendant:
Sam Adams, Michael Aloise, Jr., Ricky L. Babin and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Gaspard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Seal et al
as 2:2016cv15780
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Clark
Defendant:
Randy Seal, Jim Miller, Jerry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Jones et al
as 1:2016cv01247
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dewayne Hardy
Defendant:
Victor Jones, Jr, Herman Glen Sers, Dean Dove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. LeBlanc
as 3:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Robert Clark
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
