Cases 31 - 40 of 951
El-Bey v. Howard
as 1:2023cv03114
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
John Addison Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. USA-2255
as 1:2023cv03032
Petitioner:
John Harrison
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Day et al
as 1:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Maurice Albert Johnson
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day, Judge Peter J. Messitte, John Chamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Johns Hopkins Hospital
as 1:2023cv02838
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jerome Franklin
Defendant:
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Abello et al
as 1:2023cv02881
Plaintiff:
Enrico Brown
Defendant:
Frederick Abello, Ofc. Master Corp. Bell and Chaplin John Doe of MCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Frankhouse v. Harford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
John Byron Frankhouse
Defendant:
Harford County Detention Center and Deputy Jobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Emge v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2023cv02528
Plaintiff:
John Emge
Defendant:
DPSCS and Yes Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Doe
as 1:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Abraham Garcia Ramos
Defendant:
Dr. John/Jane Doe and Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
X. v. Yes Care Health et al
as 1:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Chris X.
Defendant:
Yes Care Health, Arresahegn Getachen, M.D., Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
