Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Campbell v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2012cv03193
Defendant:
Gengony Abbott, Keith C. Allensten, Jr., Lanet S. Asmussen and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SaLazar v. Norfolk Regional Center et al
as 4:2011cv03207
Defendant:
John Doe's, Michael Gettman, Carl K. Hart, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Ambrosio SaLazar, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Red Kettle v. United States of America
as 8:2011cv00264
Petitioner:
Byron K. Red Kettle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SaLazar v. Mental Health Board et al
as 4:2011cv03048
Defendant:
Stephanie Bruhn, Michael Gett, Carl K. Hart, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Ambrosio SaLazar, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Perry et al
as 8:2010cv00443
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Defendant:
Fred Britten, Corporal Perry and Warren K. Urbom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Chandler et al
as 8:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Defendant:
Wayne Chandler, Dr. Kamaal and Warren K. Urbom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Harriet et al
as 8:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Oscar Harriet, Marshall Lux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Urbom et al
as 8:2010cv00369
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Defendant:
Fred Britten, Cropp and Warren K. Urbom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Urbom et al
as 8:2010cv00358
Defendant:
Joseph F. Bataillon, Richard Kopf, David L. Piester and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Urbom et al
as 4:2010cv03095
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Defendant:
David L. Herzog, James Murphy and Warren K. Urbom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
