Cases 31 - 40 of 2,769
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Greening et al
as 4:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Ramirez
Defendant:
Craig Alan Greening, Wayne Dicky, Jessica Escue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00690
Petitioner:
Charles M Farmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Sanchez
Defendant:
Diana Cruz, M. Machado, Shirley W. Buttz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Doughrety et al
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Herrado J Molina
Defendant:
David G Doughrety, Jr and Sgt Katherine M Ralphs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingston v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Alexander M. Kingston
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wingham v. Shamie
as 4:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Bradford Wingham
Defendant:
Jusufu M Shamie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Rayford et al
as 9:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
J Rayford, J Hamilton, M McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit
as 6:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit, Warden Gene Miller, James M. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
