Cases 31 - 40 of 70
MITCHELL v. WATTS et al
as 2:2007cv00280
Plaintiff:
LEZMOND C. MITCHELL
Defendant:
HERRE WATTS, MICHAEL K. NALLY, R. V. VEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARRETT v. WATTS et al
as 2:2007cv00279
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E BARRETT
Defendant:
HERRE WATTS, MICHAEL K. NALLY, R. V. VEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCINTOSH v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00273
Petitioner:
CARL MCINTOSH
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORT v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00266
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SHORT
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEVENS v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00262
Petitioner:
ALAN A STEVENS
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEFF v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv01672
Plaintiff:
MARK L. NEFF
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, RICHARD CARROLL, DANIEL L. KNAPPMEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
BRYANT v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00260
Petitioner:
CHARLES BRYANT
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BURROWS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2007cv00247
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ALLAN BURROWS
Defendant:
DORIS WILLIAMS, BETH SCHARFF, G. FEARDAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SINGLETARY-EL v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00241
Petitioner:
ERIC SINGLETARY-EL
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCINTOSH v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, MICHAEL NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
